https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #55 from Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxx> --- Oleg wrote: > So far this threat is purely theoretical, there were no incidents related to that. This is incorrect. Some alt coins like PPC suffered exactly a catastrophic fork because they disregarded warnings in this regard. The diversity argument is counter to the opinion of among Bitcoin Core developers. Debating the diversity of implementations issue is not productive here. I ask that folks please defer to upstream Bitcoin Core developer opinions on the wisdom and safety of how to ship Bitcoin Core in downstream distributions. Simone wrote: > I'm fine with your proposal, but the original bug report for the review is open since 2013, and apart high level things that should be done or not done I've not seen much from you on the topic. Upstream did not have a feasible build method until recently. I am sorry this took so long. I also recognize this is extremely weird compared to the normal way software is built in Fedora. The upstream developers felt so strong about this that it was preferable to have no Bitcoin in the leading Linux distros all these years. Now however we are close to a satisfactory solution. I ask for a bit more patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
