https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731 --- Comment #53 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- First of all, I've been using these packages myself for years, but I'm all in for one that is fine by everyone, including your concerns. (In reply to Warren Togami from comment #52) > I did not appreciate how you closed Bug #1020292 and disregarded the > warnings written there. Out of respect I am not unilaterally closing this > bug. The original ticket has been closed according to guidelines and the original poster even jumped in, so respect or not, this does not give you any entitlement to close tickets arbitrarily. All you've written it's all nice but I'm not even sure if builds based on GUIX that don't follow guidelines are allowed in Fedora/EPEL. Have you checked that? If not, that as well would grant people to ignore your comments and just proceed. > Step #2 above is an opportunity to collaborate. I assigned one of my > engineers to work on this. We should collaborate on what exactly we want to > be in a bitcoincore RPM package. For example instead of your -server package > we may want to consider systemd service @ units as an official way to > configure and launch multiple nodes. I'm fine with your proposal, but the original bug report for the review is open since 2013, and apart high level things that should be done or not done I've not seen much from you on the topic. If you think the various components (guix etc.) are mature enough why don't you post a review for guix, a guix-based RPM or the parts that in your opinion are important? You can take over, I don't mind. I can take the reviews straight away if you're fine so we can get this sorted out. Even if the various components are not 100% ok like you said, already it's a start. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
