https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884608 --- Comment #19 from Kamil Páral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > As discussed by email I'm taking over this review from François. Thanks! > ATM the package is using a Conflicts tag, but we generally do not allow Conflicts > in Fedora. As discussed by email the plan is for this to replace the old dosbox > package. Hans, just checking, has this been agreed on with the existing dosbox maintainer? >From [1] I see there is some (very small) functionality loss when replacing dosbox with dosbox-staging. If this case, the new package would only be suitable for Rawhide, so that users of stable releases don't suffer any regressions, I believe (and optionally it'd be also nice to see a Fedora Change proposal created to highlight the transition). [1] https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging#summary-of-differences-compared-to-upstream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
