https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910502 code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- These days, the guidelines around licensing are a lot stricter (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/) than when the package was originally added. The license for most of the files does not appear to actually be BSD. For example, from autoconf.mk: # @(#) Copyright (c) 1996-2009, Simon J. Gerraty # # This file is provided in the hope that it will # be of use. There is absolutely NO WARRANTY. # Permission to copy, redistribute or otherwise # use this file is hereby granted provided that # the above copyright notice and this notice are # left intact. Can you identify this license? If it doesn’t correspond to a license in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses, you’ll need an opinion from legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Also relevant are the guidelines about requesting upstream to include license text in a separate file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
