[Bug 1470842] Review Request: bazel - A fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470842

Scott K Logan <logans@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |logans@xxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #6 from Scott K Logan <logans@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I know this is a long-closed ticket, but for those who want Bazel in Fedora and
stumble upon this, I thought I'd share some findings.

I did a quick-and-dirty survey to see what it would take to bootstrap Bazel for
Fedora 32, and I couldn't find the following JARs:
- auto-service-annotations.jar
- auto-value-annotations.jar
- checker-qual.jar
- com.android.tools.common.jar
- com.android.tools.layoutlib.layoutlib-api.jar
- com.android.tools.repository.jar
- commons-collections3.jar
- commons-pool2.jar
- error-prone-annotations.jar
- error-prone-type-annotations.jar
- escapevelocity.jar
- flogger.jar
- flogger-system-backend.jar
- geronimo-annotation-1.3-spec.jar
- google-api-client-jackson2.jar
- google-api-client.jar
- google-auth-library-credentials.jar
- google-auth-library-oauth2-http.jar
- google-extensions.jar
- google-http-client-jackson2.jar
- google-http-client.jar
- grpc-api.jar
- grpc-auth.jar
- grpc-context.jar
- grpc-core.jar
- grpc-netty.jar
- grpc-protobuf.jar
- grpc-protobuf-lite.jar
- grpc-stub.jar
- java-allocation-instrumenter.jar
- java-diff-utils.jar
- jsr305.jar
- netty-transport-native-epoll.jar
- netty-transport-native-kqueue.jar
- netty-transport-native-unix-common.jar
- netty-transport-sctp.jar
- opencensus-api.jar
- opencensus-contrib-grpc-metrics.jar
- perfmark-api.jar
- protobuf-util.jar
- tomcat9-annotations-api.jar

On top of those missing, there are 17 packages currently in Fedora which
provide some of the required JARs.

Getting all of the missing JARs packaged would be a lot of work, and this
package would end up with a pretty hefty number of dependencies. Given the
number of dependencies and the rate at which Bazel is tagging releases, I don't
think that this would be a trivial package to maintain.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux