[Bug 1906980] Review Request: highway - Efficient and performance-portable SIMDEfficient and performance-portable SIMD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906980

Egor Artemov <egor.artemov@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |egor.artemov@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #1 from Egor Artemov <egor.artemov@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I'm not in the packagers group however has some recommendations:

1) Build fails on aarch64, s390x, and ppc64le.
   It looks like you should list these architectures using the `ExcludeArch:`
   tag, as per packaging guidelines.

   Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=57335109
   Guideline:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures

2) Since the package provides only a static library, it will be better to
   package it as a `highway-devel` package with virtual '-static' provide as
per
   packaging guidelines.
   See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries

3) It seems documentation includes large PDF files like slides from the
presentation,
   examples, and project skeleton
   might be it is better to move them into the separate `-doc` package?

4) It seems you shouldn't install all headers, that upstream installs.
   As per
https://github.com/google/highway/blob/master/g3doc/quick_reference.md
   The only public headers that should be installed are (with dependencies):
      hwy/highway.h
      hwy/base.h
      hwy/foreach_target.h
      hwy/aligned_allocator.h
      hwy/cache_control.h
      hwy/targets.h
      hwy/ops/x86_128-inl.h
      hwy/ops/x86_256-inl.h
      hwy/ops/x86_512-inl.h
      hwy/ops/arm_neon-inl.h
      hwy/ops/wasm_128-inl.h
      hwy/ops/scalar-inl.h
      hwy/ops/shared-inl.h
      hwy/set_macros-inl.h

   But looks like it is better to fire an issue upstream to fix CMakeFiles.txt

5) It seems it is better to move commands for tests running into `%check`
section.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux