Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-client-libs - Client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=370751 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-09 01:18 EST ------- I don't think that works the way you're hoping it does. Either that or something else is wrong, because I still see the same three rpath complaints: ggz-client-libs.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/ggz/ggzwrap ['/usr/lib64'] ggz-client-libs.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ggz-wrapper ['/usr/lib64'] ggz-client-libs.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libggzmod.so.4.1.0 ['/usr/lib64'] I'm not sure why you find the usual way of dealing with rpath issues distasteful, but it does work and is minimally disruptive. Is using the system libtool instead of the broken one in the package really that bad? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review