[Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-11-07 11:02 EST -------
You missed a bunch of rpmlint complaints:

ski.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libski-1.2.so.6.0.0
/usr/lib64/libelf.so.1
ski.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libski-1.2.so.6.0.0
/lib64/libncurses.so.5

The libski-1.2.so is linked against those two libraries even though it doesn't
call any functions in them.

ski.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libski-1.2.so.6.0.0 force_user
ski.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libski-1.2.so.6.0.0 userint
ski.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libski-1.2.so.6.0.0 sim_root_len
ski.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libski-1.2.so.6.0.0 sim_root

and over 300 more similar messages.

The library calls those functions, but isn't linked against any library which
provides them.

Otherwise I think this package looks OK, but I don't know enough about the
software to know to know if the above issues are problematic.  I suspect that
the unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings are merely inefficiencies (libraries
pulled in when they're not needed) and that the undefined-non-weak-symbols are
provided by libraries which are linked into the executables which also link
against libski-1.2.so.  Still, this package included a -devel subpackage
indicating that libski might be used separately from its executables, and so the
library should actually be linked against the libraries it needs if possible.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]