Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-07 07:56 EST ------- Axel! I really would like to solve the problem "with you" ! I've imported nothing into the repository for firmware or xorg-x11-drv-ivtv yet. So i will give you the packages owership on your request as soon as the packages are approved... (for the firmware) I've recently contributed a spec file for package where the maintainer would like to stay compat with rh9 or older...(not within Fedora anyway). My point of view is if it will work with our current releases (I mean FC-6 -> F8 and epel4 epel5 ) Then I will agree to have compat field for older release (but I view this as unnecessary since we use branch for each releases). If really needed, I think any can have a split with ivtv-firmware-compat that would provides the necessary symlinks and perls requirement for older version of the driver ! (but this seems unuseful within Fedora...) Or we could have it replaced by a higher evr from your repository... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review