https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890891 --- Comment #2 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #1) > - Should not be needed > > # Force out of source build > %global __cmake_in_source_build 0 > > - Missing isa for arch: > Removed. > %package devel > Summary: Development files for the Ptex library > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version} > Fixed > - This doesn't look right: the .so file should go in the devel package and > you should have a versioned so file in the main package. IF upstream doesn't > provide a versioned so file you should ask them to do so. If they refuse, > you should version it downstream. > > %files > %doc src/doc/README > %license src/doc/License.txt > %{_bindir}/ptxinfo > %{_libdir}/*so %{_libdir}/*so is moved to devel package. Unfortunately the packaging guideline failed to provide the step to set up a versioned .so files. Meanwhile, the request is filed upstream https://github.com/wdas/ptex/issues/54 Updated SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/blender-egl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01748610-ptex/ptex.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/blender-egl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01748610-ptex/ptex-2.3.2-2.fc34.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
