https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859627 --- Comment #17 from Austin Chang <austin880625@xxxxxxxxx> --- Some findings after looking into licenses in the source files: 1. files labeled as "NTP license": arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/libiberty/strcasecmp.c, arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/libiberty/strncasecmp.c : these two files contain a statement I cannot really identify what license it is (something from UC Berkeley?) arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/readline/readline/support/install.sh : This looks like an old style MIT license arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/zlib/contrib/iostream2/zstream.h : This looks like CMR license? 2. file labeled as "ISC License GPL (v3 or later)": arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/gnulib/import/inet_ntop.c : Yes this file really contains both GPL and ISC license text. 3. file labeled as "FSF Unlimited License (with Retention) GPL (v2 or later)": arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/libtool.m4 : This is FSFULLR licensed, with a m4 macro defined at the beginning to be expanded as GPL license text, which would be used elsewhere. 4. About "Boost" license tag: I think it is already contained in my spec file(between BSD ans zlib). Now I should at least remove the "NTP" tag in spec file. You may point out what to do with above issues or other problems so that I can deal with them at once. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
