https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891646 --- Comment #3 from Scott Talbert <swt@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2) > Should the license be (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and (GPLv3+ with exceptions) to avoid > ambiguity? Yes. Good point. > I'd call it python3-sip5. Not sipbuild, but sip, because the Python package > is called sip. Consider at least providing it (via %py_provides > python3-sip5). The source and binary package or just the binary package? I can see an argument for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
