https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885415 Carl George 🤠 <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |carl@xxxxxxxxxx Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Carl George 🤠 <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> --- As we were discussing on IRC, this package doesn't need a formal review. It falls under bullet point two here [0] of multiple versions of the same package. That said, there are a few things that need to be corrected. 1. The package should to be named haproxy1.8 to comply with the naming guidelines [1]. Please close the current fedscm repo request [2] and re-do it as haproxy1.8 (still with the `--exception` flag). 2. The /var/lib/haproxy directory already exists in the RHEL haproxy package. Sharing the state directory could disturb the base package, which is not allowed by EPEL policy [3]. 3. I understand what you're trying to do with the syspaths subpackage, but similar to the previous item, this is not allowed by policy, as the files would conflict with the RHEL haproxy package. [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/29940 [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Policy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
