https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889046 José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jamatos@xxxxxxxx QA Contact|extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |jamatos@xxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> --- The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file follows the Fedora package guidelines. In this cases these are the fedora-review complaints: Issues: ======= - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION - Package requires R-core. These issues can be ignored. The funny fact here is that fedora-review also found that https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES https://r-forge.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES refer to two version of the package (1.3.7 in the former and 1.3.5 in the later). Since you packaged the latest version this harmless. The package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
