https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889072 --- Comment #3 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix@xxxxxxxxx> --- > The upstream is dead. Changed URL to fork. Is the fork just a different URL or is it a different project? From the GitHub page it seems like it's a thin wrapper around the original argyllcms located here: http://www.argyllcms.com/ What I'm trying to say is that the relationship between the package and upstream should be clear. Below still stands, I think: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 4085760 bytes in /usr/share Review: Might require an extra -data subpackage The rest looks better now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
