https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889072 --- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev <vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > Could you indicate in a comment above this line which bits use which license? Done. > The URL returns HTTP 404. The upstream is dead. Changed URL to fork. > For -devel packages providing pkgconfig files, please use the format "pkgconfig(foo)". Also, if possible, please sort the BuildRequires alphabetically. Done. > - License file missing. It should be added with the %license tag. Good catch. Fixed. > argyllcms-doc.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm Fixed. Spec URL: https://xvitaly.fedorapeople.org/for-review/argyllcms.spec SRPM URL: https://xvitaly.fedorapeople.org/for-review/argyllcms-1.9.2-10.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
