https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882547 --- Comment #5 from Artem <ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #4) > FIX: Patch tags must be unconditional. This is to ensure that a source > package will contain all the patches regardless of macros defined when > creating the source package. Indeed, thanks for pointing this. > TODO: I don't feel comfortable with including a binary. Fixed tests and updated .spec. Thanks a lot for help. --- https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-33-x86_64/01705110-osslsigncode/osslsigncode.spec https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/atim/playground/fedora-33-x86_64/01705110-osslsigncode/osslsigncode-2.0-4.fc33.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
