Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225705 ------- Additional Comments From ovasik@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-11-05 08:40 EST ------- I did rpmlint checks on docbook packages in last week, so this is not new for me and some issues were solved before that review. About that unknown tag - used virtual provide text-www-browser - which covers w3m , elinks and lynx , built with koji without troubles, elinks, lynx and w3m provides that text-www-browser in F8 and devel branch. Documented in virtual provides of Fedora. 1)About that warning with jw.1.gz - this is packaged in docbook-utils main package - and that is using it too. There is Requires:docbook-utils={%version} in subpackage , so is guaranteed, that the symlink will point to correct place. So I don't care about that warning. I would keep it like that- it is just cosmetic thing of rpmlint check, because without --nodeps you will not get situation with symlink pointing to nonexisting file. That permission 0775 is quiet strange - 0775 is permission of db2html in tarball, but in %files section I'm using %attr(0755,root,root) on it. In %install section there is used install -c -m 755 on that file, so it should have correct 755 permissions after installation. 2-3)Guidelines will be followed. 4)I don't think that the 4th point is not necessary - that last "-" for directories is by default afaik. But is harmless to add it. Please let me know if ignoring rpmlint warnings is ok in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review