[Bug 282521] Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dblatex - DocBook to LaTeX/ConTeXt Publishing


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282521





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2007-11-05 07:38 EST -------
Hopefully we are almost done, but there are still 2 issues.

First one is a license issue, indeed, some parts come from docbook-xsl, 
and the license file is missing. I suggest using
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/COPYING
under a different name.

Second one is that xsl/mathml2 is in fact derived from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xsltml/
Similarily, the license file is missing. I suggest using the
README from the latest xsltml release, which is already in xsl/mathml2,
renamed appropriately. 

I have checked that the differences are
only in entities.xsl, upstream should certainly be contacted
such that this is fixed and both versions converge. There are
also additional files in dblatex, namely mathml.xsl and 
mapmmlent.xml (which seems to be autogenerated, and it would 
be better if func2map that generated it was shipped). Then 
xsltml should be packaged on its own.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]