Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httrack - Website copier and offline browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366121 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-04 17:04 EST ------- One of the headers installed by httrack-devel includes the openssl-devel headers. ./src/htsbasenet.h:78:#include <openssl/ssl.h> ./src/htsbasenet.h:79:#include <openssl/crypto.h> ./src/htsbasenet.h:80:#include <openssl/err.h> However there does not seem to be any need for BuildRequires: openssl-devel. Is this alright? Why install headers which include stuff which are not even needed for building the library? [rishi@ginger i386]$ rpmlint httrack-devel-3.41.3-1.fc8.i386.rpm httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/liblog.so liblog.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libfilename.so libfilename.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libcontentfilter.so libcontentfilter.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libfilenameiisbug.so libfilenameiisbug.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libchangecontent.so libchangecontent.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/liblistlinks.so liblistlinks.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libdisplayheader.so libdisplayheader.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libfilename2.so libfilename2.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libsimple.so libsimple.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/httrack/libbaselinks.so libbaselinks.so.1.0.0 httrack-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [rishi@ginger i386]$ Running 'nm' on the installed *.so* files from the RPM does not return any symbols. However if they are installed from the tarball (./configure --disable-static --prefix=/usr && make && make install DESTDIR=/opt) then 'nm' displays the symbols. Also I can not understand the "dangling-relative-symlink" warning. All the *.so files in the -devel, when installed are properly linked to their corresponding *.so.* counterparts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review