https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883047 José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jamatos@xxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |jamatos@xxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> --- The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. The spec file follows the Fedora package guidelines. In this cases these are the fedora-review complaints: Issues: ======= - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION - Package requires R-core. - Package installs properly. The first two are usual and are not issues. The last one is more interesting, for a suitable definition of interesting. :-) It fails with the following error: Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides R(rprojroot) >= 1.3.2 needed by R-pak-0.1.2-1.fc34.noarch Actually consulting https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-rprojroot there is no build for rawhide (F34). And yet asking to if the package is in rawhide: # dnf -q list R-rprojroot --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide Available Packages R-rprojroot.noarch 1.3.2-9.fc33 rawhide So this is a non-issue. The package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
