[Bug 1880711] Review Request: plasma-disks - Hard disk health monitoring for KDE Plasma

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880711



--- Comment #3 from marcdeop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
(In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #2)
> (In reply to marcdeop from comment #1)
> > Is there a reason to create a new variable `%global base_name   
> > plasma-disks` when the value is the same as `Name`?
> 
> It is kind of useless in this case, but we have been using this across all
> Plasma components, because in certain cases the tarball name doesn't match
> the package name. I kept it here for consistency.

I don't mean to be offensive and maybe I am being pedantic but: wouldn't it
make sense then to always use the `base_name` variable instead of sometimes
`name` and sometimes `base_name`?

For instance, from your spec:

```
%find_lang %{name} --all-name
%files -f %{name}.lang
```

but:
```
%autosetup -n %{base_name}-%{version} -p1
Source0:       
http://download.kde.org/%{stable}/plasma/%{version}/%{base_name}-%{version}.tar.xz
URL:     https://invent.kde.org/plasma/%{base_name}
```


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux