https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880636 --- Comment #16 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jie Kang from comment #14) > (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #13) > > I wonder where is "UPL or BSD-3" coming from, should it be "UPL and BSD" > > instead? > > The README.md for jmc sources has: "The Mission Control source code is made > available under the Universal Permissive License (UPL), Version 1.0 or a > BSD-style license, alternatively. The full open source license text is > available at license/LICENSE.txt in the JMC project." > > And generally I was following dual licence scenario in: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ > LicensingGuidelines#Dual_Licensing_Scenarios In that case I strongly suggest to explain the situation in a comment. Also, the license identifier is BSD, not BSD-3. BTW That link is outdated, please use https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_dual_licensing_scenarios -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
