https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1) > There is a bit of a chicken and egg problem with python-uptime and tests. > The project itself provides tests so it's possible to add a %check phase to > the SPEC file to enable testing. However, the project doesn't use GitHub > release tarballs and versioning is limited to PyPi (via setup.py). We can > ask upstream whether it would be okay for them to start generating git > release tags as part of their PyPi-centric version-bumping routine. > What do you think? I opened an issue about the missing tests and I will talk to the developer of the package that depends on python-uptime if he is willing to move to a different module. python-uptime looks a little dead. The problem is that there are not much alternatives. Anyways, thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
