https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Following this argument, you'd have to keep doing the "old" way of naming packages in perpetuity, since compat-openssl10 and compat-openssl11 (and compat-openssl30, compat-openssl40, etc.) already exist, so this isn't going to change. You should switch to the new way of naming compat packages at some point, so why not start now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
