[Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731





------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx  2007-11-01 19:20 EST -------
(In reply to comment #67)
> I think the reason it is implemented as a service is because it loses setuid
> every time the fuse package is upgraded.  Ultimately, this sucks and we need a
> cleaner way to do this.

I can't see why the fact that it should be run upon some event 
means that this should be a service. On linux, we try not to
solve the problems by rebooting ;-). In any case is having the
fuse mounts insecure a requirement for ltsp? It doesn't seems so
to me. 

> I somewhat agree with removing those dependencies... although there is some
> attractiveness of installing one package that pulls in everything people
> typically use.  Perhaps we could instead rely upon a yum group and comps.

This shouldn't be the main ltsp-server in any case. A meta-package could
be done, but it has to be separate (even if it is defined in the
ltsp-server spec).


It would be nice to have, for each script in /usr/share/ltsp5/scripts.d
a comment at the beginning explaining what the script does. For 
example it is not clear to me what does: 
07-xinetd-sysconfig-update


I have spotted an error in 10-runlevel-hack:
/usr/X11R6/bin/X
should be 
/usr/bin/X

In 15-kwin-update, it looks like to me that /usr/share/config/kwinrc
is now /usr/share/kde-settings/kde-profile/default/share/config/kwinrc

in 14-kdmrc-update the comment seems to be wrong. Also the code
        # add ICEwm to the session list
        if ($_ =~ /^SessionTypes=/i && $_ !~ /icewm/ ) {
                s/$/,icewm/;
        }

seems to be obsolete.


I also think that the performance tuning shouldn't be done in
the default case, that is 15-kwin-update shouldn't be run, and 
in 14-kdmrc-update the following shouldn't be done in the default
case:
        # turn off the clock
        if ($_ =~ /^LogoArea=Clock/ ) {
                $_ =  "#" . $_  ;
        }


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]