[Bug 1873199] Review Request: malcontent - Parental controls implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873199



--- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #4)
> > I've added a desktop-file-validate in %check, is that enough?
> 
> Yup, that should be enough according to the packaging guidelines.
> 
> > [ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> >      Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/help/C,
> >      /usr/share/gir-1.0, /usr/share/polkit-1/actions,
> >      /usr/share/accountsservice, /usr/share/help/id,
> >      /usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d, /usr/share/help/pt_BR,
> >      /usr/share/polkit-1, /usr/share/help/uk, /usr/share/dbus-1,
> >      /usr/share/help/pl, /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0
> 
> These directories still require proper ownership. Either you make the
> subpackages which use them own them or add Requires lines for packages which
> provide them. For instance, /usr/share/polkit-1 is provided by meson or
> polkit, but I'd recommend polkit in this case. Check which directory is
> provided by what with "dnf provides <path>".

Will require:
accountsservice-0.6.55-5

All the /usr/share/help/*/ directories should be owned by filesystem, because
there's no way that gnome-user-docs will be able to own all the same dirs
random packages could own, so it'll be filesystem's job to do that.

I believe the rest is now fixed.

> A couple of extra things picked up by rpmlint:
> > malcontent-pam.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> > malcontent-ui-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> > malcontent-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> 
> Since these are stand-alone subpackages, each needs its own %doc entry with
> the README.md file.

What does "stand-alone subpackages" actually mean? All those depend on packages
from the same SRPM which contain the README, and if those are considered
"stand-alone" despite having deps on other RPMs from the same source, what's
considered "non stand-alone"?

I haven't made any changes here.

> > malcontent-ui-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package contains the pkg-config file and development headers for libmalcontent-ui.
> 
> %description lines are 80 characters max. Either split it into multiple
> lines or change it to something like "Contains the pkg-config file and
> development headers for libmalcontent-ui."

Done.

Scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=50755715


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux