[Bug 1872867] Review Request: stalld - thread stall detector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872867



--- Comment #9 from Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #6)
> Despite the CFLAGS/LDFLAGS problem mentioned in the previous comment, there
> are few more things:
> 
> - Please make consistent use of the spaces and tabs. You used tabs as a
> separator for the "Name", "Version" and others tags, but spaces for the
> "Requires" and "BuildRequires". Please be consistent. This is not a blocker,
> but nice to have.

I use emacs so that's somewhat transparent to me. I'll go through and
re-justify
the specfile and hopefully get a more consistent usage. 

> 
> - I think the systemd configuration file should be installed into the
> /etc/sysconfig, i.e. /etc/sysconfig/stalld (without the .conf), not to the
> /etc/systemd [1]. Also please change the unit file accordingly.
> 

Not sure I agree with this. The config file is strictly for the use of the unit
file and I got the impression that the customary place for these paramter files
was in /etc/systemd. Let me dig a little deeper here.


> - Please use just (this is to also get rid of the unowned
> /usr/share/stalld-1.0 directory):
> %doc README.md
> to install the README file to the right location (i.e.
> /usr/share/doc/stalld), the /usr/share/stalld-1.0 seems strange. In such
> case the README shouldn't be installed in the Makefile.
> You could also change the Makefile to use the DOCDIR variable and then
> change the spec:
> %install
> %make_install DOCDIR=%{buildroot}%{_docdir}
> 
> %files %{_docdir}/README.md

Ok

> 
> - Nice to have (not a blocker): consider adding license file to the upstream
> project and installing it in the spec by the %license tag, e.g.:
> %license LICENSE.txt

I added an SPDX tag to the source specifically so we didn't have to carry a
licence file. Do you know if there's any effort in Fedora to move the packaging
requirements to using SPDX?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux