https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873875 --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #4) > Thanks Neal. I'll have to review what the author's actual intentions were > with the license. GPLv2+ is probably fine. :) > > On the spec file: the one in the archive / source repo has some macros for > excessively-clever handling of devel and prerelease versions. I figured I'd > just clean that up for the Fedora one. Should I just make them the same and > include that? I guess I can. I mean that the spec file in the SRPM is not the same. That is, if I did `fedpkg import`, it would be not the same as the spec file you linked me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
