https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868290 --- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #10) > I've complained for the past several releases, and I'll do it again here. > > Why does the beta-blocking backgrounds have to land so close the beta > release and at the last minute? This seems to happen every release, and I > end up having to drop everything to fix the "emergency/blocker" issue of > adapting kde spin to use the new backgrounds, with little notice. > > Am I missing something? Why can't new backgrounds be adopted very early in > the development process, even before alpha? Please consider doing something > like that moving forward, to help minimize workload/stress on other > contributors. Thanks. > > I'd go so far as to humbly suggest that the landing of the new fedora > backgrounds package (just package availability, not necessarily be used yet) > should be an alpha blocker in an attempt to enforce that idea. This will be changing for the F34 cycle. The Artwork team will begin creating the new backgrounds for Fedora 34 within the next couple of weeks, with the idea that the f34-backgrounds package will be in Rawhide by the end of the year. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
