https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868850 --- Comment #9 from Qiyu Yan <yanqiyu01@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #8) > > ping? > > Apologies, wasn't aware you were waiting. > > The way I see it is that if upstream provides a test suite and one or more > tests fail on an officially supported Fedora arch, we can't ignore them and > again we would need an ExcludeArch and confirmation from the FPC. Using a ExcludeArch don't need approvement from FPC [1], and this problem is harder to debug. I think we can get this build in rawhide and wait for upstream's fix. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_build_failures > > Going forward, we either closely interact with upstream to get fixes for > archs which they don't test on (anything non-x86_64, I'm assuming?) or if > that's too cumbersome we can limit the number of archs fcitx5-chinese-addons > supports, for instance to i386 and x86_64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
