https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1873108 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #2) > > %global debug_package %{nil} > Why? Other rust-* packages ship binaries with debuginfo. Hm. Good question -- I thought it was common to not ship debuginfo in rust packages, especially since the example in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/ has '%global debug_package %{nil}'. Do you have any ideas what's missing that the debuginfo isn't generated? I am not familiar at all with rust packaging. > >BuildRequires: /usr/bin/appstream-util > Use "libappstream-glib". > >BuildRequires: /usr/bin/desktop-file-validate > Use "desktop-file-utils". Thanks for the suggestion, but I prefer it the way it is. It's more explanatory to explicitly list the binary we need. > Also, you're missing "ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches}". Yes, I didn't use that because the list is exactly the same as regular Fedora arches. We want the package on all Fedora-supported arches as it's going to be in the default Workstation install. I'll be sure to add it in the future if it's needed to keep the package building, but in the mean time I'd like to not have the ExclusiveArch to avoid surprises. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
