https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871137 Bug ID: 1871137 Summary: Review Request: acme-sh - An lightweight ACME client written purely in SH Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: ce@xxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pagure.io/fedora-rpm-addons/raw/master/f/acme-sh/acme-sh.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/lcts/fedora-rpm-addons/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01620104-acme-sh/acme-sh-2.8.6-4.1.fc34.src.rpm Description: Acme.sh is an ACME client written purely in POSIX Shell language. It implements the full ACME protocol and supports both ACMEv1 and ACMEv2 as well as ACMEv2 wildcard certificates. It can automatically issue, renew and install certificates and supports a wide variety of DNS provider APIs for DNS-01 challenges. Homepage: https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh Fedora Account System Username: lcts Notes: - The software is actually called acme.sh, but that is not an allowed package name, correct? - This program offers options to (automatically) install and update itself from the commandline. Doing so will effectively "hide" the rpm-installed version from the user. Should I patch the script to disable these options (fairly easy to do) or stay close to upstream & trust the user not to use them? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
