https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870208 --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- * `BuildRequires: vips-devel` - What is the reason to include vips-devel instead of just vips? * Requires - I think there should be something aka `Requires: vips` - Possibly, there could be required all libraries loaded via `ffi_lib` call. BTW, I'd rather see requires such as 'libvips.so.42`, but they are not properly required [1]. * Wrong shebangs: ~~~ rubygem-ruby-vips-doc.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter /usr/share/gems/gems/ruby-vips-2.0.17/example/example1.rb /usr/bin/env ruby rubygem-ruby-vips-doc.noarch: E: env-script-interpreter /usr/share/gems/gems/ruby-vips-2.0.17/example/thumb.rb /usr/bin/env ruby ~~~ [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870275 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
