[Bug 1862625] Review Request: ocaml-ppx-js-style - Code style checker for Jane Street OCaml packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862625



--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
- latest version is packaged
- MIT license is correct
- package builds and installs successfully
- package conforms to OCaml Packaging Guidelines

Please adapt the BuildRequires: (foo and bar) to (foo with bar), as mentioned
in the other Review Request.

The only thing I'm curious about is the 17.4 MB (?) ppx.exe file that's
included in the main package.
What is it? .exe files are not mentioned in the OCaml Packaging Guidelines.
It also looks unreasonably large compared to the size of the source files.

(Curiously, despite building this package with "--enablerepo local" for it to
pick up the fresh dependencies, the 555 permission issue isn't present.)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux