https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862619 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you for the review, Ankur! The next time you have a package that needs a review, let me know. (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #2) > [?]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). > ^ Both the devel and non-devel packages provide these. Is that OK? (What will > dnf choose if one simply tries to install ocaml(Ppx_here)?) > ocaml(Ppx_here) > ocaml(Ppx_here_expander) > ocaml(Ppx_here_lib) If I rebuild other OCaml packages, already in Fedora, in Rawhide then I see the same thing happen. The -devel package contains the same Provides as the main package. I don't know what has changed to cause this. Richard, if you are reading this, is this expected? > One from rpmlint: > > ocaml-ppx-here-devel.x86_64: E: zero-length > /usr/lib64/ocaml/ppx_here/ppx_here.mli > ^ > I think this is OK, but please do re-check Upstream provides a zero-byte file, because this package doesn't provide a library, but rather a syntax extension, so the library interface file doesn't need any contents. Whether we need to package it at all is the question. I don't know the answer, but will try to find out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
