https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862306 --- Comment #5 from Artur Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I think using static linking has more sense here, since we don't ship a -devel package and don't really expect to have other packages linking to libEasyRPG_Player. The "easyrpg-player" executable isn't built 100% static; only the libEasyRPG_Player is linked static. Regarding the packaging guidelines, I think this bit is of most interest here: > Executables and libraries SHOULD NOT be linked statically against libraries which come from other packages. (It is of course acceptable for files generated during a package’s build process to be linked statically against .a files generated as part of that build process.) The "easyrpg-player" uses dynamic linking for everything, apart from libEasyRPG_Player. Given what I said above about not shipping any -devel files, I think static linking against libEasyRPG_Player is fine here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
