Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlroff - A XSL-FO processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261581 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-28 04:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > So would you check if libxslt-devel is _actually_ needed? > > > > From header files it seems this "libxslt" should be "libxml-2.0" > > > > (i.e. Requires: not libxslt-devel but libxml2-devel). > > > > > > From : > > > > > > > #include <libxslt/xslt.h> > > > > #include <libxslt/xsltInternals.h> > > > > #include <libxslt/transform.h> > > > > It is for BuildRequires, not for Requires for -devel package. > > No, another package BuildRequires libfo-devel, which then in turn Requires > libxslt-devel so that the package can build. in turn Requires s|libxslt-devel|libxml2-devel| All symbols which can be used from external libraries/binaries are written in installed header files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review