[Bug 289701] Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: qca-ossl - OpenSSL plugin for the Qt Cryptographic Architecture v2


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=289701


lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx  2007-10-27 13:31 EST -------
Ok, I updated oqa2 and now qca-ossl builds fine. So...

* rpmlint not silent but this "error" may be omitted

[petro@host-12-109 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/qca-ossl-0.1-3.20070904.fc7.src.rpm 
qca-ossl.src:35: E: configure-without-libdir-spec

+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ specfile is properly named
+ package meets Packaging/Guidelines
+ package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing
Guidelines.
+ COPYING file included in %doc 
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file legible
+ sources match the upstream source:
85713bfebcb8ed4fddf6f6bc8dd930a3
/usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/qca-ossl-0.1-20070904.tar.bz2
- wrong source in spec file
must me http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/test4/qca-ossl-0.1-%{date}.tar.bz2

instead of 

http://delta.affinix.com/download/qca/2.0/beta7/qca-ossl-0.1-%{date}.tar.bz2
+ package builds file (x86)
+ all build dependencies listed in BuildRequires
+ package doesn't need to call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ package owns all created directories
+ package not contains any duplicate files in the %files listing. 
+ permissions on files sets properly
+ package has a %clean section
+ package uses macros consistently 
+ package contains code or permissable content
+ header files are in a -devel package
+ package contains no static libs
+ package does not contain any .la libtool archives
+ not a GUI app
+ all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8

Just fix the Source0 field and this package is APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]