https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859207 Artur Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|needinfo?(fedora@xxxxxxxxxx |fedora-review+ needinfo- |) | --- Comment #10 from Artur Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- >> ===== EXTRA items ===== >> >> Generic: >> [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. > >I'm not sure what does it mean - I uploaded the srpm which is created by 'fedpkg --release f32 local'. Is it really different? Oh, sorry, I missed that. I had to re-build the package locally with "BuildRequires: annobin" and I passed that SRPM to fedora-review. The provided spec name is ok. The latest spec and SRPM look fine to me. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
