[Bug 1350884] Review Request: mspgcc - Rebase of GCC for the MSP430 to TI / Red Hat upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884



--- Comment #25 from Brandon Nielsen <nielsenb@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01565363-msp430-elf-toolchain/msp430-elf-toolchain.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/srpm-builds/01565363/msp430-elf-toolchain-9.2.0.0-2.fc32.src.rpm

This hopefully addresses the issues from comment 21, as well as changing to
specifying --prefix=/usr/msp430-elf as discussed in comment 23 and comment 24.
The more I think about it, the more that's absolutely the right way to do it.
The only oddity is a lot of the actual headers and libraries for the target end
of in /usr/msp430-elf/msp430-elf, which isn't an issue, just a little ugly.

For some reason it fails to build for Fedora 32 on aarch64[0], but I was able
to do the same build with mock locally, so I'm going to assume it was an issue
on the copr end.

0 -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nielsenb/msp430-development-tools/build/1565812/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux