https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854729 Fernando F. Mancera <ferferna@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ferferna@redhat.c |needinfo+ |om) | --- Comment #12 from Fernando F. Mancera <ferferna@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Gris Ge from comment #11) > (In reply to Fernando F. Mancera from comment #10) > > The SPEC file looks good to me. I am not sure if it is a good idea to have > > the dependent crates in a Copr repository. Will this force all the users to > > enable the copr repository before installing nispor? > > The copr repo is just demonstration it works. > > Packaging rust crates is rule of Fedora rawhide. > And for Fedora stable rpm, it will just use the compiled package built from > the Fedora rawhide buildroot. > > The rust package is static linking, once compiled, it does not has runtime > dependency besides glibc. Oh, in that case, it looks good to me. Thanks for explaining. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
