Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-openchrome - Driver for VIA IGPs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=338361 ------- Additional Comments From ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-25 15:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > rpmlint turns up a few problems: > > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 > > Yeah, you should probably do the usual ldconfig run, even though another driver > with XvMC libraries (i810) doesn't do that. There's no point. The XvMC sublibraries are loadables, they're only ever used with dlopen(). > Then there are a whole bunch of these: > > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMC.so.1.0.0 _XReply > xorg-x11-drv-openchrome.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libchromeXvMCPro.so.1.0.0 _XReply They're provided by libXvMC, which dlopens libchromeXvMCPro.so. These aren't problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review