https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853617 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> --- %package doc Summary: RTKLIB manual Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} %description doc Manual for RTKLIB tools. - The doc subpackage should be noarch and no isa needed then - Source0: https://github.com/tomojitakasu/RTKLIB/tarball/%{gitcommit_full} → Source0: https://github.com/tomojitakasu/RTKLIB/archive/%{gitcommit_full}/%{name}-%{gitcommit}.tar.gz - This is not clear how you generated the patch: # https://github.com/JensReimann/RTKLIB/tree/rtklib_2.4.3 # ceb8106d53afa44cad6c45ae7873ba85ca458dc5 Patch0: rtklib-qt.patch The commit you mention is totally different from the content of the patch. If possible get the patch from a pull request or commit URL. - setup should be quiet: %setup -q - keep timestamps with "install -p" - I would split the library from the binaries by creating a libs subpackage containing %{_libdir}/libRTKLib.so.1*. Devel should thus Requires: %{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
