Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 ------- Additional Comments From opensource@xxxxxxxxx 2007-10-24 17:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't this be called haskell-X11-extras? The X11-extras is > awfully badly chosen and too generic! Maybe, but the packages this spec produces use ghc prefixes, so this may be only a problem in CVS, but when the there is a guideline for naming Haskell libraries, then this can be changed without the need of a rebuild. Using haskell as prefix for the packages is not good, because there are different incompatible haskell compilers. Using ghc-X11-extras for the spec may be a solution, but then in case it should contain also other subpackages for other compilers, it would not be good. If you demand a specific name for this package to finish review, then I would prefer to rename it to ghc-X11-extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review