Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-24 07:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 6. I'd change the summary to only include the actual chip reference and out the > full "… for hardware based on Conexant's CX23415/CX23416 codec chip such as the > Hauppauge PVR 150/250/350/500 models and other supported hardware." in > %description, as the current string is misleading and overly restrictive There are technical and legal problems: a) the firmware is procuded by Hauppauge (with Conexant's tools) and is adjusted to Hauppauge's board layout. Not every board using the Mako chip can boot of the same firmware. b) Even though many boards share the base schematics the firmware under considerartion has been channeled through Hauppauge and the license is by Hauppauge. IANAL, but I think you will be violating both Hauppauge's and another manufacturer's license if you simply use this on another board. This is not to say that users cannot use this if they think they know there are no technical issues and no legal ones as well. But it means that Fedora cannot put itself in technical and legal battles with either side. BTW no non-Hauppauge user was ever confused by the choice of the summary or description, all PVR clones knew what firmware they needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review