[Bug 1844643] Review Request: qwt5-qt5 - Qt Widgets for Technical Applications adapted to Qt5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844643

Gergely Gombos <gombosg@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Gergely Gombos <gombosg@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
LGTM! Drop me an email if you are stuck and need reviewing in the future.

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
     /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/designer/libqwt5_designer_plugin.so is not in ld
path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/doc/qt5/html(qwt-
     doc)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.

Rpmlint
-------
Checking: qwt5-qt5-5.2.3a-4.20190819giteeacc44.fc33.x86_64.rpm
          qwt5-qt5-devel-5.2.3a-4.20190819giteeacc44.fc33.x86_64.rpm
          qwt5-qt5-doc-5.2.3a-4.20190819giteeacc44.fc33.noarch.rpm
          qwt5-qt5-debuginfo-5.2.3a-4.20190819giteeacc44.fc33.x86_64.rpm
          qwt5-qt5-debugsource-5.2.3a-4.20190819giteeacc44.fc33.x86_64.rpm
          qwt5-qt5-5.2.3a-4.20190819giteeacc44.fc33.src.rpm
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/QwtLinearScaleEngine.qt5.3.gz 38: warning: numeric
expression expected (got `f')
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/QwtLog10ScaleEngine.qt5.3.gz 41: warning: numeric
expression expected (got `f')
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/QwtScaleDraw.qt5.3.gz 478: a newline character is not
allowed in an escape name
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/QwtScaleDraw.qt5.3.gz 479: a newline character is not
allowed in an escape name
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/QwtScaleDraw.qt5.3.gz 480: a newline character is not
allowed in an escape name
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/QwtScaleDraw.qt5.3.gz 481: a newline character is not
allowed in an escape name
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/qwtinstall.qt5.3.gz 52: warning: macro `man' not defined
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/qwtinstall.qt5.3.gz 108: warning: macro `Programs->Qt' not
defined
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/qwtlicense.qt5.3.gz 157: warning: macro `work' not defined
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/qwtlicense.qt5.3.gz 466: warning: macro `any' not defined
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/qwtlicense.qt5.3.gz 517: warning: macro `copyright'' not
defined
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: qwt5-qt5-debuginfo-5.2.3a-4.20190819giteeacc44.fc33.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb
backend.
warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb
backend.
qwt5-qt5-doc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/gbm19/qwt5-qt5
<urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb
backend.
qwt5-qt5-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/gbm19/qwt5-qt5
<urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb
backend.
qwt5-qt5-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/gbm19/qwt5-qt5 <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not
known>
warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb
backend.
qwt5-qt5.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/gbm19/qwt5-qt5 <urlopen
error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb
backend.
qwt5-qt5-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL:
https://github.com/gbm19/qwt5-qt5 <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not
known>
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
qwt5-qt5: /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/designer/libqwt5_designer_plugin.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/gbm19/qwt5-qt5/archive/master/qwt5-qt5-master.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
ba9c1e53f04059dfa8dfa35ce22ccede1c2baff26b91700b3b094993079d6108
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
ba9c1e53f04059dfa8dfa35ce22ccede1c2baff26b91700b3b094993079d6108


Requires
--------
qwt5-qt5 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libQt5Core.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.14)(64bit)
    libQt5Designer.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Designer.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Gui.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Gui.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Svg.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Svg.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libQt5Widgets.so.5()(64bit)
    libQt5Widgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libqwt5-qt5.so.5()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

qwt5-qt5-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libqwt5-qt5.so.5()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(Qt5Gui)
    pkgconfig(Qt5PrintSupport)
    pkgconfig(Qt5Svg)
    pkgconfig(Qt5Widgets)
    qwt5-qt5(x86-64)

qwt5-qt5-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    qt5-qtbase

qwt5-qt5-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

qwt5-qt5-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
qwt5-qt5:
    libqwt5-qt5.so.5()(64bit)
    libqwt5_designer_plugin.so()(64bit)
    qwt5-qt5
    qwt5-qt5(x86-64)

qwt5-qt5-devel:
    pkgconfig(qwt5-qt5)
    qwt5-qt5-devel
    qwt5-qt5-devel(x86-64)

qwt5-qt5-doc:
    qwt5-qt5-doc

qwt5-qt5-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    qwt5-qt5-debuginfo
    qwt5-qt5-debuginfo(x86-64)

qwt5-qt5-debugsource:
    qwt5-qt5-debugsource
    qwt5-qt5-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1844643 -v
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: C/C++, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, Perl, Haskell, SugarActivity, PHP, fonts, R, Python,
Ocaml
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux