https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833511 --- Comment #4 from Ryan O'Hara <rohara@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/rohara/1833511-golang-github-dustinkirkland- petname/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. All good. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. * snip * [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. All good. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. N/A [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines All good. [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in golang- github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. All above seem fine. Might want to check if the dataplaneapi packages that depend on this need stricter version requirements [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. N/A [ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. Looks fine. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-0-0.1.20200508git8e5a1ed.fc33.x86_64.rpm golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel-0-0.1.20200508git8e5a1ed.fc33.noarch.rpm golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debuginfo-0-0.1.20200508git8e5a1ed.fc33.x86_64.rpm golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource-0-0.1.20200508git8e5a1ed.fc33.x86_64.rpm golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-0-0.1.20200508git8e5a1ed.fc33.src.rpm golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname/.goipath golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug sources for package golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname. 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. The warning seems normal for golang pacakges. I think we've seen it in all other packages related to this dataplaneapi effort. The error appears to be complaining about the length of the resulting -debuginfo package name. We've discussed with others to see if this could be avoided, but we're stuck with it. These are OK. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debuginfo-0-0.1.20200508git8e5a1ed.fc33.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. No idea what these means. perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_US.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_US.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug sources for package golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname. golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname/.goipath 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. Same as above, but I am convinced there is a way to fix this invalid-url problem. Again, we're hit this before. Seems ok. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname/archive/8e5a1ed0cff0384869564ec1c086c6467a025667/golang-petname-8e5a1ed0cff0384869564ec1c086c6467a025667.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 29550cf760595d7c022cd04facd9ef81261953f53b5d8d18ca6cbe432f92fba3 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 29550cf760595d7c022cd04facd9ef81261953f53b5d8d18ca6cbe432f92fba3 Requires -------- golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): go-filesystem golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname: golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname(x86-64) golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel: golang(github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname) golang(github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname)(commit=8e5a1ed0cff0384869564ec1c086c6467a025667) golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-devel golang-ipath(github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname) golang-ipath(github.com/dustinkirkland/golang-petname)(commit=8e5a1ed0cff0384869564ec1c086c6467a025667) golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debuginfo golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debuginfo(x86-64) golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource: golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1833511 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: fonts, Java, Ocaml, Python, SugarActivity, R, Perl, C/C++, Haskell, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH Everything seems in order. Since this is now required for the haproxy dataplaneapi to build/work, I'm approving this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
