[Bug 1835876] Review Request: mingw-fltk - C++ user interface toolkit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835876



--- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Having given this some thought, we really don't know when upstream breaks ABI,
per the SOVERSION they set we would assume <MAJOR>.<MINOR>. 

Does <fed>abipkgdiff even work on MinGW libraries? Can we actually check for
ABI breakages? A quick search shows abi-compliance-checker supposedly does. 

Perhaps it would just be better to always rebuild dependencies? Outside of the
forthcoming data center move, it shouldn't abuse koji too much as the MinGW
ecosystem is pretty small.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux