https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836319 Antonio T. (sagitter) <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Antonio T. (sagitter) <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #5) > > [!]: Run repo-font-audit on all fonts in package. > > Note: Cannot find repo-font-audit, install fontpackages-tools package to make a comprehensive font review. > fontpackages-tools was retired and is no longer present in F32+: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontpackages/c/ > e1b656bab2373bba68dfe478ebb768a60276f296?branch=f32 > fonts-rpm-macros even provides an Obsoletes: for it: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fonts-rpm-macros/blob/f32/f/fonts-rpm- > macros.spec > > >[!]: Run ttname on all fonts in package. > > Note: Cannot find ttname command, install ttname package to make a comprehensive font review. > ttname is dead since Fedora 30, maybe even longer: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16910 > > I guess those should be filed as bugs against fedora-review? Oh, okay. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
